Hamlet’s Contradicting Traits Essay

William Shakespeare created many complex characters in his find village. One of these complex characters being the protagonist, Prince hamlet. crossroads has many contradictory traits, deuce of them being that crossroads sometimes esteems keenly, and that being overcome by the financial statement left by the feeling of his belligerent obtain, King small town, he tends to convey unreasoning decisions. When Hamlet is first introduced to the ghosts commands in sentiment one, act 5, they begin to consume him with thoughts of vengeance, to murder Claudius, his start outs murderer. by means ofout the play, Hamlet acts in such a way to provide curtilage supporting both traits. Conflicted by these two argue traits, Prince Hamlet has a war of two spirits in his mind, deciding which side is right. During the aloofness of the play, Hamlet frequently argues with himself. Many of his soliloquies are debates amongst Hamlet and the warlike side of his mind that believes he should listen to the spiteful plan of his aims ghost. At the tooth root of the play, Hamlet, the Prince of Denmark, is a logical scholar from Wittenberg.When he returns from Wittenberg, his mother, Queen Gertrude confronts him concerning his melancholy. He replies Seems, madam? Nay it is. I know non seems (1. 2. 76) He is very straightforward with her and speaks in a sensible and rational manner. This conversation happened before Hamlet encountered the ghost t herefor the militant and vindictive spirit has non yet influenced him.When Hamlet is preparing to rig the play to tidy sum a reaction from Claudius to prove he is guilty of murdering his father, he is thought rationally. Ill have these players/Play something like the murder of my father/ before mine uncle Ill observe his looks /Ill tent him to the quick if he but blench, /I know my course. (2. 2. 601-605) it takes and intelligent, sensible, and rational person to develop such a precise and functioning plan, therefor provin g Hamlet is able to think rationally. Once Hamlet has met and been influenced to his fathers ghost, he becomes consumed with the thought of avenging his father. Hamlet is not a carmine person therefor the thought of murdering Claudius causes a lot of internal conflict for Hamlet.As Hamlet and Laertes adjure in Ophelias grave, Hamlet says to Laertes For, though I am not splenitive and rash, / further have I something in me dangerous, /Which let thy wiseness fear (5. 1. 265-267). This recite proves that Hamlet is aware that though he is not generally a violent person, he now possesses something dangerous in him due to his numb(p) fathers command. Later, Hamlet claims to Laertes that he is mad. Roughly awake, I here proclaim was madness. / Who does it, then? His madness ift be so, /Hamlet is of the junto that is wrongd /His madness is poor Hamlets antagonist (5. . 224-233) according to Hamlet it was not him who killed Polonius it was his madness. Again, Hamlet is aware that aveng ing his father has goaded him to be something he is not, and to do irrational things such as murdering Polonius. Hamlet had stabbed Polonius through a curtain simply because there was a push aside chance it would have been Claudius hiding. Before checking, he quickly stabbed Polonius, this is completely irrational and risky on Hamlets fibre. This dramatic turn of events caused prejudicial repercussions towards Hamlet.By killing Polonius, Hamlet pushed Laertes to decide to penalise his own father and in the end, he murders Hamlet. The overwhelming urge to avenge his father caused Hamlet to act without opinion, putting Hamlet in a dangerous situation. collectable to Hamlets strongly contradicting traits, he frequently argues with himself, usually in his soliloquies. Hamlets soliloquy To be or not to be is a literal debate between scholarly, rational Hamlet and Prince Hamlet as the soldier-son, pursuance revenge for his pugnacious father.In this soliloquy, Hamlet questions his motives and morals. To be, or not to be that is the question/Whether tis nobler in the mind to suffer/The slings and arrows of exorbitant fortune, /Or to take arms against a sea of troubles, /And by opposing end them? (3. 1. 56-60) he is debating with himself on whether or not it is worth it to avenge his father. This way of making a decision is a rational and uniform thought process in which Hamlet is evaluating all of his options and their repercussions. However, had Hamlet not had irrational thoughts to begin with, he would not have to go through with this process.Eventually Hamlets irrational urge to avenge his father consumes him. Most of his rationality has vanished and all of his thoughts concern revenge, or are not fully thought through. In his My thoughts be bloody soliloquy, the irrational part of Hamlets divided soul is convincing him that if he does not avenge his father essentially he has no purpose What is a man,/If his chief good and market of his time /Be but to log Zs and feed? a beast, no more (4. 4. 36-38) Hamlet says if he has no purpose, he is nothing. At the end of the soliloquy Hamlet decides My thoughts be bloody, or be nothing worth (4. 4. 68) this is him saying that if his thoughts are not concerning violent actions towards Claudius, they are worthless. These thoughts are completely irrational, and the benefits and downfalls of this decision have not been taken into consideration. Later when Hamlet is asked whether he would prefer to battle Laertes now, or piddle himself some time to prepare, he quickly responds that he will fight him now, leading to Hamlets death. Again, Hamlet has irrationally made a decision without considering each side of the argument.The command left by the ghost of his father has completely overcome his mind leaving him not thinking logically or rationally as he was at the beginning of the play. Hamlet is an irrational rationalist. Before the ghost confronts him, Hamlet is a rational scholar from Wittenbe rg, however afterwards, the ghosts vengeful thoughts consumes him, giving Hamlet an irrational and violent mindset. During the play, these two combative traits are warring in his mind, and expressed through soliloquies. Many of Hamlets soliloquies are debates between these two opposing traits.Eventually, the vengeful thoughts consume Hamlet and he becomes extremely irrational. He does not plan or think anything through as he did at the beginning of the play. Hamlets irrationality is potentially the cause of his madness, and death. Had Hamlet not been so irrational whilst making decisions and allowing the vengeful thoughts left by his father to consume him, Claudius would not be seeking to murder him. Though Hamlet is genuinely a rationalist, his need to avenge his fathers death consumes him, causing him to make irrational and dislocated decisions.