Friday, March 22, 2019

life :: essays research papers

In the Bible, a book meant to be the word of God, condemns such(prenominal) things as murder, adultery and theft. I find it hard to believe that an on the whole-powerful, all-knowing, infinitely-good organism that created this world and everything in it would allow any of these things to occur. He would not yet condemn them in an ancient book, but abolish them altogether on with any other things evil. If God is supposed to be the heavenly dumbfound wouldnt he want and impose onto his children his goodness and weed out all evil? Aquinas also shows this non-existence through Objective 2 where he writes how it is expecting too much for something that can be accounted for be a hardly a(prenominal) principles has been produced by many. There are other principles that can account for everything we assimilate in our world supposing God did not exist. All things can be reduced to one principle, that of nature and therefore there is no indispensability to suppose Gods existence. Once more I agree with his rationale of this subject, for it is lawful to believe in a simple, visible, measur up to(p) concept such as the principle of nature, instead of something so complex it is near in-conceivable, and not able to be seen or measured. Nature could have accounted for the gradual development of human and scientific theories have given us explanations for the existence of nature and evidence of this gradual development. Our planets creation has been explained as a result of The Big rush and mans development from a single-cellular organism to the multi-cellular, intelligent man of today by evolution. I agree with both of Thomas Aquinas Objectives and it is mainly because of these two arguments that I, myself do not believe in the existence of

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.